A New Approach to Understanding the Contemporary China (5)

We are focusing on examining an emerging social power which represents the rise of anti-globalization movement. This kind of social power is always shifting its shape, density and capacity based on different politico-economic climates and social conditions. Of course, it is possible to measure this power by following the quantitative method mentioned above: to produce lots of statistic figures related to the existing of the social power. However, the figures can only indicate the “status quo” of the power sustaining in a very short time. To produce complex quantitative data is, in our research context, not a right approach to constructing a qualitative understanding on the current ongoing development of the social power for common people’s voices.

Here is an alternative approach to discovering the significance of the practices of the independent media activism as an influential social power developing in Hong Kong and Taiwan.

We will get start with revealing and analyzing the unique characteristics of the practices of the independent media movement in the Chinese societies. Comparing the characteristics of the movement practices with the Western counterparts’ and discovering the hidden connection between the contemporary social movement and the Chinese traditional thought – Daoism are the next two important steps. There is no doubt that Chinese society as a whole has been impacted by the domination of globalized capitalist economy and Western scientific civilization. However, the Chinese is still keeping its unique thinking logic and its clear attitude toward the contemporary changing world in a distinctive historical context. This can be evidenced by the fact that a “dialectical adaptive logic” has been embedded, developed and working in Chinese people’s mind, influencing the development of Chinese society from past to now. The form of this special logic for life is made by the long-term feudalism of the ancient China and the Westerns’ “colonization” with the Communist ruling over the modern China that the Chinese have never had the opportunity to develop their socio-political sense “to live their own life”.

Today, the brain of the West has dominated most of the academic studies on contemporary China, seeing the Chinese as the “follower”, ignoring the existence of the distinctive logic for harmonizing the hard social reality with the “to-be-oneself” idealism of the Chinese people. Therefore, how to open up a new approach to consider this “home-grown” logic is a crucial thing. Through our study on the independent media in Hong Kong and Taiwan, we discover that certain Chinese traditional thoughts can play a role in explaining various social phenomena emerging in the contemporary Chinese society, meanwhile the logic is fully considered.

Finally, a completely new concept – “Open Structure” is to be presented not only for embodying the logic’s existentiality but also for interpreting the close relationship between the Chinese society, the characteristics of the media movement practices and Daoism. Through the new concept, a bold attempt to examine the significant reflection of today’s Chinese on the nature of the globalized civilization by reconnecting the ancient thinking with the contemporary reality will be realized. Also, the concept is anticipated to help open up an advanced construction of an open knowledge structure beyond the existing East-West epistemological perspective, on which the next stage of human civilization for all people can be based.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)


A New Approach to Understanding the Contemporary China (4)

For contemporary media studies, many researchers tend to develop their understanding on media with the methodology for social science: carrying out lots of works for producing “useful statistic figures”, such as the numbers of media members, the page views of the website, etc. for measuring the social influence of media in order to build up the “validity” and “reliability” of their research. According to the so-called “scientific” data, they are able to “objectively” argue that a significant role of media in, for example, changing the developing tendency of society is justified. This is a typical process of following the research approach to understanding the nature of various kinds of social phenomena. Undoubtedly, this approach can contribute to human knowledge development and civilization advancement, helping construct a complex thinking apparatus for science. However, it puts the statistic and pragmatic reasoning at the peak of the human knowledge building. Difficulties would be unavoidably produced in the research process when sticking with this limited methodology because all social phenomena, whether they occur in the East or the West, are always in the “becoming” based on different space-time conditions. It is impossible to establish a fixed, rigid theory to end up our understanding on society by relying on the temporary data as evidence for any knowledge justification.

Therefore, we have a concrete reason not to use the methodology mentioned because we view our research subject: the independent media in Hong Kong and Taiwan as a kind of people’s collective activism being practiced in “where we are”, not in the outer unrelated. The practices of the independent media activism as part of anti-globalization movement cannot be simply seen as an unmoved social phenomenon, but should be defined as a humanist demand that is developing in the world “connected with us”. The demand of the social activists emphasized in the movement is closely related to everyone’s life because for the time being no one can escape from this unequal and injustice globalized society. This is the “becoming” of a desirable civilization for all: every member of the globalized society should be encouraged to publicly express their own opinion for a more idealistic development of globalization. To hear and understand these people’s thinking based on a positive attitude toward the fundamental media movement is our responsibility. Here, we therefore hold a clear standpoint: we do not want to carry out a typical academic research on the independent media movement as the “others’ noise” in the social, but want to launch a meaningful research with the anti-globalization movement contributed by the Chinese independent media. To follow this logic, we refuse to use any quantificational method for constructing this study. If not, the original goal of this research – not to help strengthen the still image of the “developing” China but to discover how the people in the Chinese realize their dissenting movements by using their own way – would be derailed.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)

A New Approach to Understanding the Contemporary China (3)

In the Conclusion, text research with theories and interview content analyses will be exercised again. For justifying the Daoist characteristics of the practices of the media activism in the Chinese societies, we will establish certain thinking approaches to revealing what spiritual elements in Daoism are embodied in the practices. After that, a new approach to understanding the present and future tendency of the socio-political development of Chinese society in globalization will be opened up.

On the other hand, in Chapter Three and Four qualitative analysis is, also, one of the major research method to be used for the case studies of the Hong Kong and Taiwan independent media movements. The method is twofold: first, the representative founders of “Inmediahk.net” and “Coolloud.org” are to be interviewed that the first-hand qualitative data of the independent media movements are therefore obtained. Here, the qualitative data will reflect three main aspects of the nature of the media activisms: (1) the substantial ground of the independency of the media movement practices; (2) the distinctive approaches developed by the media activists in Hong Kong and Taiwan; (3) the core value or belief held by the activists for the practices. We will discuss the data in detail with the method of qualitative analysis for the production of the two case studies. After this study process, certain significant point of views on justifying the Daoist characteristics of the independent media movements are to be presented. The existence of these distinctive characteristics of the media movement practices suggests that the anti-globalization movement itself is being developed not only with globalization but also with localization. Moreover, the characteristic practices evidence that the social activists in the Chinese actually have given their exclusive feedback to the current extreme development of the globalized world by conforming to a “localized” thinking logic that is totally dissimilar to the Westerns’.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)

A New Approach to Understanding the Contemporary China (2)

First, text research will be mainly used in Chapter Two and the Conclusion. As mentioned, the globalization of anti-globalization movement is connected with the current problematic development of world economy and power politics, in which the quality of people’s life is gradually corrupted. “Representative democracy” powered by party politics can be easily directed by global financial institutions and business corporations through the transnational cooperative mechanisms, such as WTO, IMF, G20, WEF (World Economic Forum), etc. The global players try their best to intervene in any principle and law-making processes, redefining the politico-economic “order” of the contemporary world for their self-interest. As we can see, the neo-liberal principle for world economy set by the governments, institutions and bankers has made a series of economic crises in the global market. However, they do not want to take the responsibility to pay off the “negative outcome”, but tend to transfer the unwanted to ordinary people through tax rising (with different names). This shows a serious flaw in the ruling and crises makers’ operation: why do the tax payers have no choice but to accept the governments’ impotence? In fact, world citizens are bearing the economic pressure contributed by various austerity policies made by the powers because the governmentals themselves have sunken into their own bankrupt mire after saving the players’ interests. As a result, globalization has done nothing for people’s well-being: the wealthy is still wealthy, the poor poor as usual. If you accept the capitalist logic for wealth accumulation, anything goes.

Therefore, anti-globalization movement is developing around the globe that is inspired by certain critical theories and radical philosophies with anti-government and anti-capitalist reasoning. For understanding them clearly, it is necessary to examine and analyze the relative contents of the philosophies carefully. After that, we can find out some important hints that would help us clarify the close relationship between the current development of the globalized world and the idealism in the humanist theories as well as the practice of anti-globalization movement.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)

A New Approach to Understanding the Contemporary China

One of the purposes of this study is to unveil and analyze the human problems brought by the negative effects of economic globalization. These include the rise of global capitalism, the deterioration of the operation of representative democracy in the developed realm and the widespread development of anti-globalization movement – the independent media activisms in the Chinese societies. Through the case studies of the Hong Kong and Taiwan independent media, some unique characteristics of the media movement practices are to be discovered: the media runnings not only embody the spirit of Daoism, but also help open up a new approach for us to understand the significant role of the Chinese traditional thought in influencing the contemporary development of Chinese society. For this humanist study, we will use two main research methods: (1) text research (for examining the historical context and relative theories of anti-globalization movement); (2) qualitative analysis, including (a) to interview the major founders of “Inmediahk.net” and “Coolloud.org”; (b) to analyze the interview contents as the first-hand information of the independent media research that the distinctive characteristics of the media movement practices are contained and reflected.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)

Globalization and the Media Activism (4)

Also, the rise of global capitalism, which has caused the solidification of consumerist thinking of people around the world, violates the original ecology of the natural environment. Today, environmental pollution has become one of the serious issues affecting the sustainability of human civilization. For this, there are noteworthy points to explain why the political powers are unable to control the ongoing destruction of the Nature, including the phenomena of deforestation, desertification, sea-level rising, etc. Besides global capitalists intervening in the politics of environmental protection for their interest, one of the major reasons is the contemporary has constructed an alienated understanding on the role of the Nature in filling the unlimited demand of the human economy conforming to the dominative logic of capitalism. Murray Bookchin unveils why our civilization cannot allow a radical reverse of the destructive development of the Nature, arguing that: “the roots of the present ecological crisis do not lie in technology, overpopulation, or industrial growth alone but rather in the practice of domination and hierarchy.”[1] That is to say, any attempt to environmental protection must firstly renounce the dominative logic embedded in every aspect of human civilization development, otherwise the unsuccessful is to be made. This libertarian ecological theory, not based on praising anthropocentrism but on respecting the subjectivity of the Nature, is of a significance when the “natural disasters” like the Japan’s “311 Earthquake” causing the nuclear disaster in Fukushima in 2011, the 2012 hurricane “Sandy” making a serious flooding in New York, the U.S., etc. have been occurring, signaling the humans’ alienated practice of dominative hierarchy with the capitalist logic against the natural environment is seriously problematic.

The popularization of information technology has offered a very valuable opportunity for all humanistic and libertarian thinking to be developing. This technological development actually fosters a new civilization condition for people to know more about and even take part in social movement practice. At a global level, the enlargement of anti-globalization movement relies on worldwide promotion of a direct-action culture and exercise of transnational information exchange among different peoples as the globalization of social movement practice. As mentioned, global activists use the Internet as an instrument with the features of low-cost, open and no-border to realize their goal. The Independent Media Center (IMC) is one of the notable examples of the practice of anti-globalization movement in the contemporary.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)

[1] See: Marshall, Peter (1992). Demanding the Impossible — A History of Anarchism. Great Britain: Fontana. p. 609.

Globalization and the Media Activism (2)

As we can see, globalization alters its shape according to the evolution of dominative power, bringing us a living circumstance under various crises, including the economic and the social ones. Ulrich Beck argues that profit making and social problems production are always interrelated: “In advanced modernity the social production of wealth is systematically accompanied by the social production of risks[1]. In today’s “risk society”, the positive aspects of globalization, such as human knowledge popularization and global unbundling of wealth accumulation, and the negative aspects of globalization, like the rapid rise of political and religious conflicts as well as terrorism, are all to be real and present. However, the negative globalization is usually ignored by the so-called “globalism”[2] or “neo-liberalism” proponents. Beck maintains that “globalism sees everything as economically determined and determinable. Any political, social or cultural matters are subsumed under economic (and particularly neoliberal economic) paradigms”[3]. The “globalists” are so keen to emphasize the “advantages” of the development of (economic) globalization praising the values of capitalism, consumerism and utilitarianism. This can be the first image of globalization structured in people’s knowledge.

(See: The Theory and Practice of Anti-Globalization Movement: Case Studies of the Independent Media in the Chinese Societies – Hong Kong and Taiwan. Bonn: Bonn University. 2014)

[1] “Accordingly, the problems and conflicts relating to distribution in a society of scarcity overlap with the problems and conflicts that arise from the production, definition and distribution of techno-scientifically produced risks.” See: Beck, Ulrich (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE. p. 19.

[2] According to the definition of “globalism” given by Beck: “By globalism, I mean the view that the world market eliminates or supplants political action – that is, the ideology of rule by the world market, the ideology of neoliberalism.” See: Beck, Ulrich (2001). What Is Globalization? USA: Blackwell. p. 9.

[3] See: Mooney, Annabelle; Evans, Betsy (2007). Globalization: The Key Concepts. Oxon: Routledge. p. 116. Also, “Beck rejects globalism, the ideology of neoliberalism which declares that the world market has eliminated the need for or possibility of political action. Globalism touts a crushingly simplistic explanation of globality, reducing the complex process of globalization to one dimension, the economic. All other domains – ecology, culture, politics, civil society – are represented as being determined by the logic of the market. Beck repeatedly characterizes globalism as a ‘thought-virus’ that has penetrated all the major social institutions, not least political parties and the media.” See: Aldridge, Alan (2005). The Market. Cambridge: Polity. p. 130.